Adam Crotsley CPDT-KA
Certified Professional Dog Trainer (North America),
Canine Enrichment Technician Certification,
Certified in Training Shelter Dogs.
Specializes In Dog Training
Other Services:
Dog Walking, Pet Sitting,
Animal Photography, Drug Administration,
and Dog Bathing
General Liability Coverage

HOW TO HIRE AN ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL
UNDER CONSTRUCTION EVEN MORE COMING SOON
Scientific Research
Against Positive Punishment!

AVSAB
American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior
Positions system:
Are adversive training techniques, appropriate for animals who exhibit aggression? Animals with challenging behavior disorders, such as aggression should be treated with effective, compassionate, and humane methods of training, rather than with a “heavy hand” there are no exceptions to this standard!”
“ Why should adversives of training techniques be avoided? The consequences and fallout from aversive training methods have been proven and are well documented. These include increased anxiety, and fear-related aggression, avoidance, and learned helplessness. Animals may be less motivated to engage in training and less likely to interact with human members of the household.”
Https://avsab.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/AVSAB-Humane-Dog-Training-Position-Statement-2021.pdf
IAABC
International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants
IAABC International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants
Their position is defined by the following principles:
-
Adherence to LIMA: IAABC certified behavior consultants are required to follow Least Intrusive, Minimally Aversive (LIMA) protocols.
-
Prohibition of Aversives: The organization prohibits techniques designed to intentionally cause fear, pain, or startle in animals. Specific forbidden tools and methods include:
-
Choke collars, prong collars, and shock collars (including "stim-collars" and "e-collars").
-
Shaker cans, citronella spray, or water spray.
-
Leash corrections or leash-pops.
-
Yelling.
-
Against Our Code of Ethics To Use.
Forms of Positive Punishment!
Prohibited!
Choke collars, prong collars, "gentle" leaders, & shock collars (including "stim-collars" and "e-collars").
Shaker cans, citronella spray, or water spray.
Leash corrections, leash-pops, or helicoptering
Yelling, hitting, pinning down, "alpha methods", forcibly holding mouth closed, or excessive physical restraint.
Use of these methods constitutes a breach of our agreement and may result in forfeiture of refunds for any scheduled appointments, depending on the severity of the situation. In certain cases, services may be paused or discontinued prior to the completion of sessions. Services will only resume once a reassessment has been conducted and it has been confirmed that appropriate, ethical methods are being consistently followed.
Choosing a Professional Dog Trainer
Questions To Ask???
At Tail Wags Training, we focus on building strong bonds between pets and their owners. Our expert trainer Adam Crotsley CPDT-KA only uses positive reinforcement methods backed by scientific based research to ensure a happy learning experience for all. View the hire a professional worksheet to see how to properly hire a professional accredited dog trainer.

Countries and Organizations
Ahead of the Curve

IACP
International Association Of Canine Professionals
Tracking Legislation Worldwide
Awareness of enacted and proposed laws ensures trainers remain compliant and can adapt their training approaches while continuing to advocate for balanced, effective, and humane practices. It also allows trainers to educate clients and the general public accurately, protect their businesses from potential liability, and participate meaningfully in legislative discussions that shape the future of the profession.
Countries with Enacted Bans
-
Wales – First in the UK to ban e-collars in 2010, making it illegal to use electronic collars for training.
-
Germany, Austria, Switzerland – Prohibit e-collars and prong collars under animal welfare laws.
-
France – Bans electronic collars and prong collars.
-
Spain – Enforced bans on e-collars and prong collars.
-
Scandinavia & Nordics – Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland ban e-collars, with Sweden and Finland also banning prong collars.
-
Netherlands – Ban on e-collars.
-
Slovenia – Ban on e-collars.
-
Canada – Quebec province bans e-collars.
-
Australia – Capital Territory, Queensland, SA (South Australia) and NSW (New South Wales) have banned e-collars and prong collars.
-
Colombia – Enacted a ban on e-collars and prong collars as of July, 2025.
Countries with Proposed Bans
-
Belgium (Flanders) – E-collar ban due to take effect in 2027.
-
India – Shown with proposals at state level (some states reviewing legislation).
-
England – A ban on e-collars was attempted in 2024, but was not enacted.
-
Scotland and Ireland – E-Collar bans being proposed.
-
Singapore – An advisory has been issued to dog training professionals and dog owners to avoid using e-collars and prong collars while still endorsing the use of Least Intrusive Minimally Aversive (LIMA) approach to training.
-
Other parts of Australia – Reflect proposed legislation in additional states beyond those where bans are enacted.
Other Proposals (Licensure/Regulation)
-
New York (USA) – Requires the commissioner of agriculture and markets to establish licensing and educational standards for individuals providing canine training for non-service and non-police dogs; requires such standards to utilize non-aversive, evidence-based, and positive reinforcement techniques.
-
Massachusetts (USA) – Proposal for mandatory use of “evidence-based” training techniques that do not result in pain, discomfort, fear or anxiety; provided that electric, prong or choke collars shall not be used as part of this modification plan; further all professionals involved in said modification plan shall be educated in and employ methods that adhere to the principles of the American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior and the American College of Veterinary Behaviorists
https://iacpdogs.org/2025/08/18/%F0%9F%8C%8D-tracking-legislation-worldwide/
BVA
British Veterinarian Association
BVA and BSAVA policy position on the use of aversive training devices in dogs and cats Introduction BVA and BSAVA support and recommend positive training methods as the most effective training intervention for companion animals in terms of health, welfare and behavioral outcomes.
Under the UK Animal Welfare Acts humans responsible for animals must ensure that the animals under their care are protected from unnecessary pain, suffering, injury and disease. This includes unnecessary pain or suffering inflicted with inappropriate and aversive training methods or containment systems. We have concerns about the use of aversive training devices to control, train or punish dogs and cats. Aversive training devices include electric collars which are used as a means of punishing or controlling behavior of companion animals is open to potential abuse and incorrect use of such training aids has the potential to cause welfare and training problems.
BVA and BSAVA position on electric pulse training collars used to deliver an electric shock in dogs and cats.
BVA and BSAVA are calling for a complete ban on the sale and use of electric pulse training collars used to deliver an electric shock in dogs and cats in order to help protect animal welfare. Instead, we support and recommends positive training methods. Electric pulse devices are sometimes used in dog and cat training as a form of punishment to prevent a dog or cat from repeating bad behaviour. Evidence demonstrates that positive training methods are the most effective training intervention for companion animals in terms of health, welfare and behavioral outcomes. Research has shown that the application of electric stimulus, even at a low level, can cause physiological and behavioral responses associated with stress, pain and fear. In light of the evidence, we have concluded that electric pulse collars raise a number of welfare issues, such as the difficulty in accurately judging the level of electric pulse to apply to a dog or cat without causing unnecessary suffering. The Animal Welfare (Electronic Collars) (Wales) Regulations 2010 have made it an offense for a device capable of emitting an electric shock to be attached to a dog or cat in Wales. In addition, in 2018 Defra announced a ban on the use of electric shock collars for cats and dogs and the Scottish Government issued guidance making it clear that training that the use of aversive training devices, including electric collars, may constitute the offense of causing unnecessary suffering under the Animal Welfare Act (2006). Defra’s Code of Practice for the Welfare of Dogs also advises that good training can enhance a dog’s quality of life, but punishing a dog can cause it pain and suffering … All dogs should be trained to behave well, ideally from a very young age. Only use positive reward-based training. Avoid harsh, potentially painful or frightening training methods’. Recommendation 1: The UK Governments should bring into force a complete ban on the sale and use of electric pulse training collars for dogs and cats to protect animal welfare. Recommendation 2: BVA and BSAVA support and recommend positive training methods as the most effective training intervention for cats and dogs in terms of health, welfare and behavioral outcomes. BVA and BSAVA position on the use of electric containment systems for dogs and cats We note a paucity of evidence examining the effectiveness and welfare impacts of the use of electric containment systems for dogs and cats in comparison to the evidence available regarding the use of electric shock collars.
Guidance BVA policy position on the use of aversive training devices in dogs and cats. We would strongly support the undertaking of further independent peer-reviewed research, including a comprehensive literature of existing evidence, to robustly assess the effectiveness of electric containment systems and their impact on animal welfare. UNTIL further research is conducted however, we DO NOT SUPPORT the use of buried or hidden electric containment fences for dogs and cats that require animals to learn where the boundary is positioned through successive shocks in the absence of any physical or geographical demarcation.
Netherlands
Network For Animals
The Netherlands has banned the use of shock collars on domestic pets – effective from July 2020 – in a move to improve animal welfare. Those who utilize shock collars after 1 July 2020 could face a fine of up to 20,000 euros ($22,437) or even a Prison Sentence of 3 years!!!
This banning of the devices was announced by the country’s Agriculture and Nature Minister Carola Schouten, who says there is no evidence that shock collars achieve better results in behavioral training.
https://networkforanimals.org/the-netherlands-outlaws-dog-shock-collars/
